Research Agenda

Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Governance

I am a philosopher based in Milan, Italy. My research sits at the intersection of philosophy, artificial intelligence, and governance. It spans four connected streams — from the epistemics of frontier models, to the formal foundations of fairness and trust, the institutional design of AI accountability, and the ethics of data and AI in health.

Frontier-model epistemics & evaluation

How large language models form and revise beliefs, attribute sources, and express (mis)calibrated confidence — and how to evaluate and constrain these behaviours. Topics: LLM belief-formation, source-attribution bias, coherence bias, calibration, epistemic constitutions, and model self-correction. This stream connects classical epistemology to the evaluation of frontier AI systems.

Formal foundations of trust and fairness

The logico-mathematical structure of trust, fairness, and explanation in algorithmic systems. Topics: formal models of trust, counterfactual fairness, equality of opportunity, calibration as a fairness requirement, explainability, and the robustness of explanations over time. Representative work: “How Much Do You Trust Me?” (Synthese 2023); “In AI We Trust Incrementally” (Philosophy & Technology 2020); “A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML” (ACM FAT* 2019); “Fair Equality of Chances for Prediction-Based Decisions” (Economics & Philosophy 2023); “Is Calibration a Fairness Requirement?” (ACM FAccT 2022).

AI governance & accountability

Institutional design for the responsible deployment of AI in the public and private sector. Topics: public-sector AI, algorithmic audits, institutional accountability, democratic oversight, systemic-risk regulation (Digital Services Act and EU AI Act), and deployment governance. Representative work: “Towards Accountability in the Use of AI for Public Administrations” (AAAI/ACM AIES 2021); “Regulating the Undefined: Addressing Systemic Risks in the Digital Services Act” (Philosophy & Technology 2025); the AlgorithmWatch Impact Assessment Tool for public-sector automated decision-making.

Data ethics & AI in health

The ethics of data and predictive systems in medicine and public health. Topics: the digital phenotype, data cooperatives and data ownership, clinical prediction, fairness in health, and digital contact tracing. Representative work: “The Digital Phenotype” (Philosophy & Technology 2019); “Towards Rawlsian ‘Property-Owning Democracy’ Through Personal Data Platform Cooperatives” (CRISPP 2023); “How to Fairly Incentivise Digital Contact Tracing” (Journal of Medical Ethics 2021); the “Fair Predictions in Health” project (Marie Skłodowska-Curie, Politecnico di Milano).

Code, data & open source

Open materials supporting this research, by stream:

Dr Michele Loi - AI expert, business consultant and research leader
Industry - Civil Society - Governmental - Academic partnerships and collaboration - Dr Michele Loi - AI ETHICS EXPERT BUSINESS CONSULTANT RESEARCH LEADER small

Research Agenda

Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Governance

Dr Michele Loi - AI expert, business consultant and research leader

My research sits at the intersection of philosophy, artificial intelligence, and governance. It spans four connected streams — from the epistemics of frontier models, to the formal foundations of fairness and trust, the institutional design of AI accountability, and the ethics of data and AI in health.

Frontier-model epistemics & evaluation

How large language models form and revise beliefs, attribute sources, and express (mis)calibrated confidence — and how to evaluate and constrain these behaviours. Topics: LLM belief-formation, source-attribution bias, coherence bias, calibration, epistemic constitutions, and model self-correction. This stream connects classical epistemology to the evaluation of frontier AI systems.

Formal foundations of trust and fairness

The logico-mathematical structure of trust, fairness, and explanation in algorithmic systems. Topics: formal models of trust, counterfactual fairness, equality of opportunity, calibration as a fairness requirement, explainability, and the robustness of explanations over time. Representative work: “How Much Do You Trust Me?” (Synthese 2023); “In AI We Trust Incrementally” (Philosophy & Technology 2020); “A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML” (ACM FAT* 2019); “Fair Equality of Chances for Prediction-Based Decisions” (Economics & Philosophy 2023); “Is Calibration a Fairness Requirement?” (ACM FAccT 2022).

AI governance & accountability

Institutional design for the responsible deployment of AI in the public and private sector. Topics: public-sector AI, algorithmic audits, institutional accountability, democratic oversight, systemic-risk regulation (Digital Services Act and EU AI Act), and deployment governance. Representative work: “Towards Accountability in the Use of AI for Public Administrations” (AAAI/ACM AIES 2021); “Regulating the Undefined: Addressing Systemic Risks in the Digital Services Act” (Philosophy & Technology 2025); the AlgorithmWatch Impact Assessment Tool for public-sector automated decision-making.

Data ethics & AI in health

The ethics of data and predictive systems in medicine and public health. Topics: the digital phenotype, data cooperatives and data ownership, clinical prediction, fairness in health, and digital contact tracing. Representative work: “The Digital Phenotype” (Philosophy & Technology 2019); “Towards Rawlsian ‘Property-Owning Democracy’ Through Personal Data Platform Cooperatives” (CRISPP 2023); “How to Fairly Incentivise Digital Contact Tracing” (Journal of Medical Ethics 2021); the “Fair Predictions in Health” project (Marie Skłodowska-Curie, Politecnico di Milano).